USGS-NWQL: O-2002-01: Pesticides and Selected Degradates in Water by C-18 Solid-Phase Extraction and GC/MS
- Summary
- Analytes
- Revision
- Data and Sites
Official Method Name
|
Methods of Analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory - Determination of Pesticides and Selected Degradates in Water by C-18 Solid-Phase Extraction and GC/MS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current Revision
| 2001 | ||||
Media
|
WATER | ||||
Instrumentation
|
Gas Chromatography with Mass Spectrometry Detection | ||||
Method Subcategory
|
Organic | ||||
Method Source
|
USGS-NWQL
|
||||
Citation
|
Sandstrom, M.W., Stroppel, M.E., Foreman, W.T., and Schroeder, M.P., 2001, Methods of Analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory-Determination of Moderate-Use Pesticides and Selected Degradates in Water by C-18 Solid-Phase Extraction and Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry: USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4098, 70 p. | ||||
Brief Method Summary
|
A method for the isolation and analysis of 21 parent pesticides and 20 pesticide degradates in natural-water samples is described. Water samples are filtered to remove suspended particulate matter and then are pumped through disposable solid-phase-extraction columns that contain octadecyl-bonded porous silica to extract the analytes. The columns are dried by using nitrogen gas, and adsorbed analytes are eluted with ethyl acetate. Extracted analytes are determined by capillary-column gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry with selected-ion monitoring of three characteristic ions. The upper concentration limit is 2 micrograms per liter (ug/L) for most analytes. | ||||
Scope and Application
|
The method is suitable for the determination of low-level concentrations (1 to 1,000 nanograms per liter) of pesticides and pesticide degradates in filtered natural-water samples. The methods are applicable to pesticides and degradates that are (1) efficiently partitioned from the water phase onto a C-18 organic phase that is chemically bonded to a solid porous silica matrix, and (2) sufficiently volatile and thermally stable for gas chromatography. Suspended particulate matter is removed from the samples by filtration, so this method is suitable for pesticides and degradates in the dissolved phase. | ||||
Applicable Concentration Range
|
0.001-1.0 for most analytes in analysis | ||||
Interferences
|
Interferences might be caused by organic compounds that have gas-chromatograph retention times and characteristic ions with a mass identical to those of the pesticides and degradates of interest. Contaminants in laboratory air, solvents, reagents (including water), glassware, sample bottles and caps, SPE columns, and sample-processing equipment can cause artifacts or false positives in the chromatograms. All of these materials must be routinely demonstrated to be free from interference [less than long-term method detection level (LT MDL), once determined] under conditions of analysis by analyzing laboratory reagent blanks. Matrix interferences might be caused by contaminants that are coextracted from the sample. The extent of matrix interferences will vary, depending on the nature of the sample matrix. Residual chlorine in treated water samples might cause degradation of some analytes, especially organophosphorus compounds (Dennis and others, 1979). Suitable reagents that might be used to dechlorinate chlorinated water samples have not been tested for their effect on all analytes. Pesticide degradates might be formed by degradation of the parent pesticide in the hot injection port of the GC. These degradates are considered artifacts of the analytical process, and are not representative of the concentration of analytes in the water samples. | ||||
Quality Control Requirements
|
Method blanks, reagent spikes, surrogate spikes, certified reference material samples, continuing calibration verification standards, field blanks, field replicates, matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates, quarterly control samples and Branch of Quality Assurance samples are analyzed. Data from these are compiled to continually monitor the QA/QC of the analysis. Each analyst must undergo technical and ethics training, perform an initial demonstration of capability, and annually demonstrate continuing capability on an analysis. Additional QA/QC practices may be added. | ||||
Sample Handling
|
1L GCC - This schedule consumes the entire container. Description: 1 L Glass bottle, amber bottle baked at 450 deg C by laboratory - SOME GCCs should be filtered. CHECK METHOD REFERENCE OR EMAIL LABHELP@USGS.GOV FOR FILTERING REQUIREMENTS. Treatment and Preservation: DO NOT RINSE BOTTLE. Do not fill bottle beyond shoulder, reagents must be added to the sample at the NWQL before analyses. Chill sample and maintain at 4 deg C, ship immediately. | ||||
Maximum Holding Time
|
7 days from sampling | ||||
Relative Cost
|
Greater than $400 | ||||
Sample Preparation Methods
|
USGS-WRIR 95-4105 |
This method has 68 analytes associated with it.
Analyte | Detection Level |
Bias | Precision | Pct False Positive |
Pct False Negative |
Spiking Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,4-Naphthoquinone(130-15-4)
|
0.008 ug/L | 33% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.03 ug/L | ||
1-Napthol(90-15-3)
|
0.036 ug/L | 82% Rec (SL) | 0.01 Rel F-pseu % | 0.03 ug/L | ||
2',6'-Diethylchloroacetanilide(6967-29-9)
|
0.002 ug/L | 83% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
2,5-Dichloroaniline(95-82-9)
|
0.009 ug/L | 67% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
2-(4-tert-butylphenoxy)-cyclohexanol(1942-71-8)
|
0.004 ug/L | 74% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
2-Amino-N-isopropylbenzamide(30391-89-0)
|
0.001 ug/L | 46% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
2-Ethyl-6-methylaniline(24549-06-2)
|
0.002 ug/L | 72% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
2-[(2-Ethyl-6-methylphenyl)amino]-1-propanol(61520-53-4)
|
0.058 ug/L | 87% Rec (SL) | 0.02 Rel F-pseu % | 0.10 ug/L | ||
3,4-Dichloraniline(95-76-1)
|
0.002 ug/L | 65% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
3,5-Dichloroaniline(626-43-7)
|
0.002 ug/L | 78% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
3-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline(98-16-8)
|
0.002 ug/L | 31% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
3-Phenoxybenzyl alcohol(13826-35-2)
|
0.013 ug/L | 56% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.08 ug/L | ||
4,4'-Dichlorobenzophenone(90-98-2)
|
0.001 ug/L | 85% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
4-(Hydroxymethyl)pendimethalin(56750-76-6)
|
0.046 ug/L | 81% Rec (SL) | 0.02 Rel F-pseu % | 0.10 ug/L | ||
4-Chloro-2-methylphenol(1570-64-5)
|
0.001 ug/L | 47% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
4-Chlorobenzylmethyl sulfone(98-57-7)
|
0.008 ug/L | 52% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Azinphosmethyl oxon(961-22-8)
|
0.001 ug/L | 34% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Bifenthrin(82657-04-3)
|
0.001 ug/L | 25% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Chlorpyrifos oxon(5598-15-2)
|
0.010 ug/L | 35% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.08 ug/L | ||
Cycloate(1134-23-2)
|
0.002 ug/L | 89% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Cyfluthrin(68359-37-5)
|
0.001 ug/L | 42% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.03 ug/L | ||
Cypermethrin(52315-07-8)
|
0.001 ug/L | 26% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.03 ug/L | ||
Dichlorvos(62-73-7)
|
0.003 ug/L | 45% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.03 ug/L | ||
Dicrotophos(141-66-2)
|
0.017 ug/L | 38% Rec (SL) | 0.01 Rel F-pseu % | 0.10 ug/L | ||
Dimethoate(60-51-5)
|
0.001 ug/L | 35% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Disulfoton sulfone(2497-06-5)
|
0.003 ug/L | 43% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Endosulfan ether(3369-52-6)
|
0.002 ug/L | 103% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Endosulfan sulfate(1031-07-8)
|
0.002 ug/L | 58% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Endosulfan-I(959-98-8)
|
0.001 ug/L | 52% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Endosulfan-II(33213-65-9)
|
0.004 ug/L | 58% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.03 ug/L | ||
Ethion(563-12-2)
|
0.001 ug/L | 39% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Ethion monoxon(17356-42-2)
|
0.007 ug/L | 43% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Fenamiphos(22224-92-6)
|
0.015 ug/L | 101% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.10 ug/L | ||
Fenamiphos sulfone(31972-44-8)
|
0.001 ug/L | 36% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.08 ug/L | ||
Fenamiphos sulfoxide(31972-43-7)
|
0.000 ug/L | 45% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.08 ug/L | ||
Fenthion(55-38-9)
|
0.003 ug/L | 43% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Fenthion sulfoxide(3761-41-9)
|
0.002 ug/L | 52% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Flumetralin(62924-70-3)
|
0.001 ug/L | 35% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Fonofos oxon(944-21-8)
|
0.001 ug/L | 56% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Herbicides(E-12839)
|
N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
Hexazinone(51235-04-2)
|
0.002 ug/L | 32% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.03 ug/L | ||
Iprodione(36734-19-7)
|
0.746 ug/L | 412% Rec (SL) | 0.24 Rel F-pseu % | 0.10 ug/L | ||
Isofenphos(25311-71-1)
|
0.001 ug/L | 67% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Malaoxon(1634-78-2)
|
0.001 ug/L | 50% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.03 ug/L | ||
Metalaxyl(57837-19-1)
|
0.002 ug/L | 82% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Methidathion(950-37-8)
|
0.001 ug/L | 45% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Methylparaoxon(950-35-6)
|
0.010 ug/L | 64% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.08 ug/L | ||
Myclobutanil(88671-89-0)
|
0.001 ug/L | 37% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
O-ethyl-O-methyl-S-propylphosphorothioate(76960-87-7)
|
0.003 ug/L | 68% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Organophosphate pesticides(E-12873)
|
N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
Oxydisulfoton(2497-07-6)
|
0.001 ug/L | 108% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.08 ug/L | ||
Oxyfluorfen(42874-03-3)
|
0.002 ug/L | 44% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Paraoxon-ethyl(311-45-5)
|
0.002 ug/L | 63% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.03 ug/L | ||
Phorate oxygen analog(2600-69-3)
|
0.008 ug/L | 16% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.08 ug/L | ||
Phosmet(732-11-6)
|
0.001 ug/L | 22% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.03 ug/L | ||
Phosmet oxon(3735-33-9)
|
0.009 ug/L | 31% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.10 ug/L | ||
Profenofos(41198-08-7)
|
0.001 ug/L | 45% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Prometryn(7287-19-6)
|
0.002 ug/L | 75% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Propetamphos(31218-83-4)
|
0.001 ug/L | 67% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Sulfotepp(3689-24-5)
|
0.001 ug/L | 71% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Sulprofos(35400-43-2)
|
0.002 ug/L | 26% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Tebupirimphos(96182-53-5)
|
0.002 ug/L | 73% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Tefluthrin(79538-32-2)
|
0.001 ug/L | 32% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Temephos(3383-96-8)
|
0.036 ug/L | 34% Rec (SL) | 0.02 Rel F-pseu % | 0.10 ug/L | ||
Terbufoxon sulfone(56070-15-6)
|
0.018 ug/L | 52% Rec (SL) | 0.01 Rel F-pseu % | 0.08 ug/L | ||
Terbuthylazine(5915-41-3)
|
0.005 ug/L | 88% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
Tribufos(78-48-8)
|
0.001 ug/L | 36% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.02 ug/L | ||
λ-Cyhalothrin(91465-08-6)
|
0.001 ug/L | 20% Rec (SL) | 0.00 Rel F-pseu % | 0.03 ug/L |
Precision Descriptor Notes: | Short-term method detection limits (MDL's) for pesticides and pesticide degradates were estimated by determining the analytes in eight reagent-water samples fortified at concentrations of 0.015 ug/L for most analytes. For this report, the F-pseudosigma rather than the standard deviation was used to calculate the MDLs. Analytes that passed both initial GC/MS and SPE validation experiments were used in additional quantitative validation studies of bias and variability in three water types (pesticide-grade water, surface water, and ground water) at two nominal concentrations (0.10 and 1.0 ug/L), and at a low concentration (0.015 to 0.10 ug/L) to determine initial MDL's. In addition, analyte holding-time experiments on the SPE column and in water were conducted. Parent pesticides were analyzed separately from degradates to assess formation of degradates during sample processing and analysis. In addition, unfortified samples of the surface water and ground water were extracted and analyzed to determine background concentrations of the pesticides. Each sample set was fortified, extracted, and analyzed on different days during June to July 1999, so comparison of different matrices and concentrations includes bias from day-to-day variation. For additional information see USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4098. |
---|---|
Detection Level Note: | The National Water Quality Laboratory (NWQL) has addressed the limitations of the USEPA Method Detection Limit (MDL) procedure outlined in 40 CFR 136, App. B. The NWQL recommends an alternative for determining MDLs and reporting limits. It Is called the Long-Term Method Detection Limit (LT-MDL). The LT-MDL is designed to catch greater method variability because it requires a larger number of replicate spike samples (at least 24 per year) data be gathered over a longer period of time (6 to 12 months) and incorporates more measurement variability inherent in routine sample analysis such as multiple instruments, operators, calibrations, blank contributions and sample preparation events. The LT-MDL is based upon key assumptions underlying the USEPA procedure. These are a normal frequency distribution, constant standard deviation, and best-case detection. LT-MDLs, like MDLs, are determined using spikes in a clean matrix. See USGS Open File Report 99-193 regarding the LT-MDL. |
Revision | PDF/Link |
---|---|
2001 |
The Water Quality Portal contains
sample results from
sites that use this method.
Download WQP data
Select data:
File format:
Sites where this method was used
Loading Sites ...